Qualifying Prospects
Not every prospect is a good fit. This page defines how to identify good versus bad fit early in conversations.
Qualification Decision Flow
Why Qualification Matters
- Misaligned prospects become problem engagements
- Time spent on bad-fit prospects is time not spent on good ones
- Saying no early is better than failing mid-engagement
- Our reputation depends on successful engagements
Good Fit Indicators
A prospect is likely a good fit if they:
Organizational Characteristics
- Are a small or medium business seeking control and flexibility
- Have internal IT capability or willingness to build it
- Value ownership of systems and data
- Are cautious about vendor lock-in
- Understand that systems require ongoing investment
Attitude Indicators
- Ask thoughtful questions about trade-offs
- Want to understand, not just buy
- Are willing to invest in training and enablement
- Accept that they will have operational responsibilities
- Have realistic timelines and expectations
Technical Indicators
- Are open to open-source solutions
- Have or are willing to arrange hosting infrastructure
- Understand that software requires maintenance
- Are not looking for a "set and forget" solution
Poor Fit Indicators
A prospect is likely a poor fit if they:
Organizational Characteristics
- Want a vendor to "just handle everything"
- Have no internal IT capability and no intention to build one
- Are looking for the cheapest possible option
- View software as a one-time purchase, not ongoing investment
- Have extremely aggressive or unrealistic timelines
Attitude Indicators
- Want guarantees about third-party software behavior
- Resist learning about the systems they'll operate
- Expect 24/7 support or on-call availability
- Push back on clear scope definitions
- Ask repeatedly for things we've said we don't do
Technical Indicators
- Need managed hosting but refuse to arrange it separately
- Have complex requirements but minimal budget
- Want heavy customization as a first priority
Qualification Questions
Use these questions early in conversations:
Understanding Their Situation
- "Tell me about your current systems and what's driving this change"
- "What does your internal IT capability look like?"
- "Who will be responsible for operating this system day-to-day?"
- "What's your timeline, and what's driving that timeline?"
Testing Alignment
- "How do you feel about open-source software?"
- "Are you comfortable being responsible for hosting and infrastructure?"
- "What level of ongoing investment are you planning for maintenance and updates?"
- "How important is it that you can operate independently of any vendor?"
Surfacing Expectations
- "What would success look like for this project?"
- "What are you expecting from a consultant in this engagement?"
- "Have you worked with consultants before? What worked or didn't work?"
- "What happens after the initial implementation?"
Handling Misalignment
When you identify misalignment, address it directly:
"Based on what you've described, I want to be upfront: our model may not be the best fit for your needs. You're looking for [X], and we specifically don't provide that. Would it be helpful if I explained why, or would you prefer I point you toward vendors who do offer that?"
This is not a failure — it's protecting both parties from a problematic engagement.
Escalation
If you're uncertain about fit, escalate internally before proceeding. See Escalation for procedures.