Skip to main content

Explaining Trade-offs

Prospects must understand constraints and risks before engaging. This page defines how to communicate trade-offs honestly and effectively.

Why Trade-offs Matter​

Every technical decision involves trade-offs. Our role is to ensure clients make informed decisions. Hiding or minimizing trade-offs leads to:

  • Unrealistic expectations
  • Disappointment when constraints surface later
  • Blame when things don't work as imagined
  • Damaged trust and reputation

Core Trade-offs to Communicate​

Open-Source Trade-offs​

Benefits to emphasize:

  • No license fees for the software itself
  • Full ownership and control of the codebase
  • No vendor lock-in
  • Community support and transparency

Constraints to explain:

  • Requires internal capability or external support for maintenance
  • May have less polish than commercial alternatives
  • Updates and security patches are your responsibility
  • Commercial support options vary by platform

"Open-source means you own the software completely, but it also means you're responsible for operating it. There's no vendor to call at 2 AM."

Customization Trade-offs​

When prospects want heavy customization:

  • Every customization increases maintenance burden
  • Customizations can break during platform upgrades
  • More customization = more ongoing cost
  • Some customizations make systems unsupportable

"Customization is possible, but it comes with long-term costs. Every modification is something you'll need to maintain, test, and potentially redo when the platform updates. We generally recommend working within the platform's design rather than against it."

Timeline Trade-offs​

When prospects want things fast:

  • Speed often trades against quality and sustainability
  • Rushed implementations create technical debt
  • Skipping proper analysis leads to rework
  • Training takes time regardless of implementation speed

"We can move quickly, but there's a minimum time required to do things properly. Rushing past requirements analysis or skipping training creates problems that take longer to fix than they would have taken to prevent."

Cost Trade-offs​

When prospects are budget-constrained:

  • Lower cost usually means reduced scope, not reduced quality
  • Cutting corners creates future costs
  • Cheap implementations often cost more over their lifetime
  • Internal effort is a cost even if it's not our invoice

"We can work within budget constraints, but we do that by adjusting scope, not by cutting corners. A smaller, well-implemented system is better than a large, poorly-implemented one."

How to Present Trade-offs​

Structure​

  1. Acknowledge what they want
  2. Explain the trade-off clearly
  3. Present the options
  4. Let them decide

Example Script​

"I understand you want [feature/approach]. Here's what that involves: [explain trade-off]. You have a few options: [option A with trade-off], [option B with trade-off], or [option C with trade-off]. Which direction makes sense for your situation?"

Language to Use​

  • "Here's what that involves..."
  • "The trade-off is..."
  • "That's possible, but it means..."
  • "You'll need to weigh..."
  • "The long-term implication is..."

Language to Avoid​

  • "That's not a good idea" (judgmental)
  • "You don't want that" (presumptuous)
  • "That never works" (absolute)
  • "Sure, no problem" (dismissive of complexity)

Specific Scenarios​

"Can you guarantee this will work?"​

"We can guarantee our work — that we'll follow best practices and deliver what we scope. We cannot guarantee the behavior of third-party software, because we don't control it. What we can do is reduce risk through careful selection, proper configuration, and thorough testing."

"Our timeline is fixed and aggressive"​

"I understand the timeline pressure. Let me be direct: there's a minimum amount of time required to do this properly. If we compress beyond that, we're trading quality for speed, which usually costs more in the long run. Let's look at what scope is realistic for your timeline."

"We need this to be customized heavily"​

"Customization is technically possible, but I want you to understand the implications. Every customization is maintenance burden — you'll need to maintain it, test it with each upgrade, and potentially rebuild it when the platform evolves. What specific business need is driving the customization request? Sometimes there are alternative approaches."

"Can you just handle everything?"​

"Our model is specifically designed around client ownership. We provide guidance and enablement, but you retain operational control. This protects you from dependency on any single vendor, including us. If you're looking for a fully managed service, that's a different type of engagement than what we offer."